Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Sonar

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 28.9 to 21.1.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Sonar specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
ProviderAmazonPerplexity
Noometry Index42.838.5
Released—2024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$1
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1447—

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1415—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LMArena Expert1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LMArena Non-English1381—
LMArena Chinese1372—
LMArena Russian1391—
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1381—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LMArena Longer Query1400—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Sonar
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Sonar?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Sonar better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper