Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs GPT-5.1-Codex

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.1-Codex OpenAI

38.2

Rank #178 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 35.8 to 29.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.1-Codex specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
ProviderAmazonOpenAI
Noometry Index42.238.2
Released—2025-11-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—400K
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.1 (#97), GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.7 (#107)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—66%
LMArena WebDev—1337
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench—1,245

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: —, GPT-5.1-Codex: 37.8 (#32)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-Bench—60.4%
METR Time Horizons—70.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 27.8 (#97), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Hard Prompts1415—

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 35.8 (#136), GPT-5.1-Codex: 29.3 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
ProofBench—9%
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 39.7 (#115), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Expert1445—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.4 (#121), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Non-English1381—
LMArena Chinese1373—
LMArena Russian1393—
LMArena Spanish1390—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 73.1 (#121), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Instruction Following1381—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#114), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Longer Query1401—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.6 (#123), GPT-5.1-Codex: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than GPT-5.1-Codex?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or GPT-5.1-Codex better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.1 vs 41.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and GPT-5.1-Codex share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.1-Codex has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper