Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 28.9 to 22.4.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.8 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1404 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1390 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1381 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1400 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1380 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.