Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen Max

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Qwen Max Alibaba (Qwen)

34.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen Max in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads 38.5 to 22.3.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.834.7
Released—2024-04-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—33K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.60
Output $ / M tokens—$6.40
Results tracked1323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Coding14471288
Aider Polyglot—21.8%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14151269

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Math14041275
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—16.1%
MATH Level 5—67.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Expert14441248
GPQA Diamond—56.1%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Non-English13811263
LMArena Chinese13721254
LMArena Russian13911274
LMArena Spanish13901290
LMArena French—1330
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1205
LMArena Korean—1142

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Instruction Following13811262

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Longer Query14001288
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen Max
LMArena Text13961282
LMArena Creative Writing13311248
LMArena Multi-Turn13801277

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen Max?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper