Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 57.4.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.845.3
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#96), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14471487

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 28.9 (#98), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14151483

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 38.5 (#136), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14041474

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 40.3 (#120), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14441489

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 50.2 (#126), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English13811465
LMArena Chinese13721534
LMArena Russian13911471
LMArena Spanish13901470
LMArena French—1484
LMArena German—1487
LMArena Japanese—1495
LMArena Korean—1438

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 72.9 (#126), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13811467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 42.7 (#119), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14001476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10: 57.4 (#129), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text13961470
LMArena Creative Writing13311464
LMArena Multi-Turn13801478

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 26 01 10 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper