Model comparison

Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.5

Rank #112 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 44.0 to 34.2.

Side by side

Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Qwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.545.3
Released2026-02-23—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding14121487
LMArena WebDev1244—
ALE-Bench221.8—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5-Flash: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2462.69—

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14031483
Chess Puzzles21%—
Mystery Game Puzzles20%—
DTBench82.9%—
LMCA29.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.98—

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14071474
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)6.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert14071489
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
SimpleQA Verified20.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate10.5%—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English13851465
LMArena Chinese14461534
LMArena French14121484
LMArena German13901487
LMArena Japanese13681495
LMArena Korean13441438
LMArena Russian13791471
LMArena Spanish14001470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13741467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query13921476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.5-FlashQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text13971470
LMArena Creative Writing13431464
LMArena Multi-Turn13931478

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-Flash has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper