Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 39.2 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1130 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1155 |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1116 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.