Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Granite 3.0 2b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.5 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
ProviderAmazonIBM
Noometry Index42.930.8
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Coding14301090
BigCodeBench Instruct—20.5%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14271073

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Math14191117

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Expert14081064

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13981033
LMArena Chinese14401070
LMArena Russian13951045

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13871056

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13911070

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10Granite 3.0 2b Instruct
LMArena Text14201080
LMArena Creative Writing13501046
LMArena Multi-Turn14091053

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Granite 3.0 2b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper