Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 38.9.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 52.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.