Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

50.3

Rank #40 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 0 categories and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 46.2 to 28.1.
  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
ProviderAmazonDeepSeek
Noometry Index42.350.3
Released—2026-09-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—393K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1225

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.8 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Coding14301511
LMArena WebDev—1620
SciCode—51.9%
ALE-Bench—1,092

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 46.2 (#39)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14271485
NYT Connections (extended)—89.6%
CritPt—14.3%
DTBench—89.9%
LMCA—47%
Surface Evolver Bench—46.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.01

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 48.4 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Math14181493
ProofBench—54%

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 41.6 (#97)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Expert14091505

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.5 (#29)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Non-English13991452
LMArena Chinese14401506
LMArena Russian13971473
LMArena French—1448
LMArena Spanish—1499

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.6 (#24)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13871475

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#46)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13911476

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.8 (#43)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
LMArena Text14201465
LMArena Creative Writing13511436
LMArena Multi-Turn14091460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1540

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper