Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.7 to 42.4.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 44.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $10 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 78 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1452 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 85.9% |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1455 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.8% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 79.9% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.32 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 82.3% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 90.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |
Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1507 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1460 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1473 |
Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1436 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |
Long Context Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1449 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 91.7% |
Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Pro leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1453 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1453 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 67.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?
Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?
Gemini 2.5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.8 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.