Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads 51.6 to 38.6.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 44.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 164K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.26 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.38 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.4 (#61)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1454 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1362 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 59% |
| SciCode | — | 38.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 39.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 37.9 (#31)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 39.6% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 56.7% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 42.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,034 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.0 (#185)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1433 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 52.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 36.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 57% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 65% |
| DTBench | — | 87.7% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.28 |
Math DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 40.8 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1435 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 57.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 87.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 22.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1436 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.3% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.4 (#85)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1423 |
| LMArena French | — | 1435 |
| LMArena German | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1441 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1413 |
Long Context DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1428 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
| CL-bench | — | 13.2% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 9.5% |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1425 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1403 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1515 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.4 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 48.