Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs Dolly 2.0-12b
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Dolly 2.0-12b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 59.5 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Databricks |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 25.5 |
| Released | — | 2023-04-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 776 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 804 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 89.67 |
| HellaSwag | — | 70.8% |
| PIQA | — | 75.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 61.8% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 871 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 39.6% |
| BoolQ | — | 56.3% |
| MMLU | — | 26.2% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 39.2% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 836 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 836 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 814 |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), Dolly 2.0-12b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | Dolly 2.0-12b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 851 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1350 | 864 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 740 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than Dolly 2.0-12b?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or Dolly 2.0-12b better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and Dolly 2.0-12b share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Dolly 2.0-12b has 17.