Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs GPT-4o mini
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4o mini in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 36.1 to 9.9.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 25.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), GPT-4o mini: 21.6 (#330)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1290 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 3.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 11.8% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 46.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 43.1% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 83.5% |
| MBPP+ | — | 72.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4o mini: 27.2 (#95)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 17.4% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), GPT-4o mini: 8.7 (#343)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 10.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 28.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 32.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 54.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 50% |
| LMCA | — | 10.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 126.56 |
| LiveBench | — | 41.3% |
| PIQA | — | 88.7% |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), GPT-4o mini: 9.9 (#307)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1267 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.9% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 28% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 36.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 52.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 91.3% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), GPT-4o mini: 17.7 (#279)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | 1235 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 37.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 8.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 60.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 37.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 36.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.7% |
| MMLU | — | 81.8% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, GPT-4o mini: 25.3 (#117)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1066 |
| Video-MME | — | 64.8% |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 34% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), GPT-4o mini: 42.2 (#194)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1266 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1264 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1275 |
| LMArena French | — | 1296 |
| LMArena German | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1216 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1276 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), GPT-4o mini: 62.1 (#234)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1259 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 56.8% |
| IFEval | — | 78.2% |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), GPT-4o mini: 39.1 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1289 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), GPT-4o mini: 39.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | GPT-4o mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1286 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1268 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1285 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 67.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 873 |
| WildBench | — | 79.1% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 28.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than GPT-4o mini?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 25.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or GPT-4o mini better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 21.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and GPT-4o mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4o mini has 60.