Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs DeepSeek LLM 67B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 38.6 to 7.1.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 24.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 41.5 (#112), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1430 | 1096 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 28.1 (#93), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.54 |
Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 36.1 (#130), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1418 | 1108 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.4% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.6 (#133), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 24.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1409 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.7 (#103), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1399 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1440 | 1132 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.4 (#117), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1079 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#120), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1092 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.7 (#104), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1351 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1409 | 1082 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.