Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs Mercury 2.5

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#101); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mercury 2.5 Inception

30.2

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 36.4 to 22.4.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Mercury 2.5 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index42.430.2
Released—2026-09-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—260K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.04
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked172

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), Mercury 2.5: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Coding1433—
ALE-Bench—301.65

Reasoning Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), Mercury 2.5: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts1422—

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), Mercury 2.5: 22.4

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
ProofBench—3%
LMArena Math1431—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), Mercury 2.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Expert1432—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), Mercury 2.5: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Non-English1405—
LMArena Chinese1463—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena German1396—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1387—
LMArena Russian1395—
LMArena Spanish1444—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), Mercury 2.5: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Instruction Following1387—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), Mercury 2.5: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Longer Query1395—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), Mercury 2.5: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10Mercury 2.5
LMArena Text1415—
LMArena Creative Writing1349—
LMArena Multi-Turn1380—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than Mercury 2.5?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has enough public results to be ranked (#101); Mercury 2.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper