Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 vs GLM-4.7-Flash

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.7-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

38.4

Rank #175 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher in 8 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads 59.0 to 47.7.
  • GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GLM-4.7-Flash specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index42.438.4
Released—2026-01-19
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.06
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1721

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 41.6 (#109), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Coding14331383

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 27.9 (#94), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14221356
Chess Puzzles—0%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 36.4 (#116), GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Math14311354
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—58.3%

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 39.3 (#122), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Expert14321357
GPQA Diamond—60.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 52.1 (#91), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Non-English14051331
LMArena Chinese14631403
LMArena French14491332
LMArena German13961336
LMArena Korean13871284
LMArena Russian13951333
LMArena Spanish14441351
LMArena Japanese1383—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 73.4 (#118), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13871327

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 42.5 (#116), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13951345

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10: 59.0 (#109), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10GLM-4.7-Flash
LMArena Text14151351
LMArena Creative Writing13491297
LMArena Multi-Turn13801342
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1125

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 11 10 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper