Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Wizardlm 70b

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 34.8.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
ProviderAmazonMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.133.0
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding14121081

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13961079

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14251116

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1386—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13721078
LMArena Chinese14041052
LMArena German13911083
LMArena Russian13711155
LMArena French1425—
LMArena Japanese1360—
LMArena Korean1324—
LMArena Spanish1382—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13651093

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13701097

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13941120
LMArena Creative Writing13181149
LMArena Multi-Turn13641108

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper