Model comparison
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Wizardlm 70b
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.2 to 34.9.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.6 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#155), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1436 | 1081 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1360 | — |
| SciCode | 35.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 26.4 (#121), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1421 | 1079 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 51.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 51.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 84.3% | — |
| LMCA | 32.2% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 36.4 (#114), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1432 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.2 (#138), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1431 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.0 (#52), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.8 (#101), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1400 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1425 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1400 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1442 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1364 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1423 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 74.0 (#109), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1399 | 1093 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#105), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1410 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.2 (#98), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1369 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1416 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.