Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs MiniMax-M2.1

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.4

Rank #177 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 4 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 27.3 to 15.8.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and MiniMax-M2.1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
ProviderAmazonMiniMax
Noometry Index41.538.4
Released—2025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1722

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.1 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Coding14131421
LMArena WebDev—1384
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.7 (#91)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), MiniMax-M2.1: 15.8 (#301)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Hard Prompts13961410
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), MiniMax-M2.1: 35.6 (#142)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Math14251396

Knowledge Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), MiniMax-M2.1: 37.7 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Expert13851432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%

Multilingual Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.2 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English13721378
LMArena Chinese14051430
LMArena French14261405
LMArena German13911380
LMArena Japanese13551287
LMArena Korean13271297
LMArena Russian13711386
LMArena Spanish13811396

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), MiniMax-M2.1: 74.0 (#108)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following13651399

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query13701416

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.5 (#114)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20MiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text13941392
LMArena Creative Writing13181362
LMArena Multi-Turn13641396

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.0 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper