Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen1.5-110B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 Amazon

42.1

Rank #118 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.6 to 38.0.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.134.2
Released—2024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1720

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding14121184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13961168
ForecastBench—57.7

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math14251185

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert13861144

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13721142
LMArena Chinese14041206
LMArena French14251151
LMArena German13911123
LMArena Japanese13601074
LMArena Korean13241044
LMArena Russian13711118
LMArena Spanish13821142

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13651158

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13701157

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13941175
LMArena Creative Writing13181148
LMArena Multi-Turn13641160

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper