Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs QwQ-32B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

QwQ-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

39.8

Rank #159 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 4 categories and QwQ-32B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 40.5.
  • QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and QwQ-32B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.939.8
Released—2024-11-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Coding13701333
Aider Polyglot—20.9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—44.6%
LiveBench Coding—72.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.4%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561325
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning—83.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65%
Epoch Capabilities Index—137.6
ForecastBench—58.3
LiveBench—72%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—59.2%
LiveBench Math—77.8%
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
GPQA Diamond—65.3%
Confabulations—15.6%
LMArena Expert—1324

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Non-English13401305
LMArena Chinese13411378
LMArena French—1336
LMArena German—1313
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1279
LMArena Russian—1297
LMArena Spanish—1354

Instruction Following QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Instruction Following13151297
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.8%

Long Context QwQ-32B leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Longer Query13331308
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09QwQ-32B
LMArena Text13641329
LMArena Creative Writing13071288
LMArena Multi-Turn13551314
Short-Story Creative Writing—80.2%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1257
LiveBench Language—51.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than QwQ-32B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 39.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or QwQ-32B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and QwQ-32B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper