Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.6 to 55.0.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.443.5
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked933

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Coding13711456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13561448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.41

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LMArena Math—1447
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%
LMArena Expert—1457

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English13411429
LMArena Chinese13451479
LMArena French—1450
LMArena German—1463
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1428
LMArena Spanish—1463

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13161420

Long Context Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query13341439
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text13651439
LMArena Creative Writing13071401
LMArena Multi-Turn13541446

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 39.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen3 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper