Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #82 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 37.8.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.543.5
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Coding14131456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13961448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.41

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Math14251447
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Expert13851457
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English13721429
LMArena Chinese14051479
LMArena French14261450
LMArena German13911463
LMArena Japanese13551399
LMArena Korean13271397
LMArena Russian13711428
LMArena Spanish13811463

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13651420

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query13701439
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text13941439
LMArena Creative Writing13181401
LMArena Multi-Turn13641446

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Qwen3 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper