Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 27.3 to 14.8.
  • Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.929.0
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.17
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked915

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1370—
BigCodeBench Complete—46.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
BALROG—7.8%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1356—
DTBench—47.7%
LMCA—6.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.51

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.5%
Omni-MATH—29.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—35.5%
MMLU-Pro—53.9%
GPQA (HELM)—34.1%
MMLU—72.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1340—
LMArena Chinese1341—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
IFEval—74.1%
LMArena Instruction Following1315—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Text1364—
LMArena Creative Writing1307—
WildBench—73.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn1355—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper