Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 3.2 3B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.4

Rank #318 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 24.9.
  • Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.2 3B specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index41.428.4
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—118K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.33
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Coding13711098
BigCodeBench Instruct—23.4%
BigCodeBench Complete—28.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—21.9%
BALROG—10.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Hard Prompts13561095

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Math—1126

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Expert—1090

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Non-English13411019
LMArena Chinese13451017
LMArena German—1056
LMArena Russian—949

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following13161089

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Longer Query13341101

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Text13651110
LMArena Creative Writing13071094
LMArena Multi-Turn13541105
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—595

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.6 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.2 3B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper