Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 42.1.
  • Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.932.7
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13701210

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13561208

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Omni-MATH—16.1%
LMArena Math—1208

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13401160
LMArena Chinese13411192
LMArena Russian—1187

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13151186
IFEval—78%

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13331194

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13641218
LMArena Creative Writing13071199
LMArena Multi-Turn13551221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper