Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs MiniMax-M2.7

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 27.3 to 19.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and MiniMax-M2.7 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
ProviderAmazonMiniMax
Noometry Index41.937.7
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked930

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding13701454
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts13561422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
ProofBench—3%
LMArena Math—1420

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%
LMArena Expert—1444

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English13401382
LMArena Chinese13411441
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Russian—1383
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following13151405

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query13331419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text13641405
LMArena Creative Writing13071354
LMArena Multi-Turn13551412

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper