Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs MiniMax M1

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax M1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and MiniMax M1 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
ProviderAmazonMiniMax
Noometry Index41.940.3
Released—2025-06-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—40K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.55
Output $ / M tokens—$2.20
Results tracked918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Coding13701359

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts13561339

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Math—1361

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Expert—1317

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English13401319
LMArena Chinese13411360
LMArena French—1370
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1217
LMArena Korean—1266
LMArena Russian—1329
LMArena Spanish—1353

Instruction Following Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following13151312

Long Context Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query13331326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09MiniMax M1
LMArena Text13641343
LMArena Creative Writing13071298
LMArena Multi-Turn13551335

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than MiniMax M1?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 40.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 39.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and MiniMax M1 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper