Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 3.2 90B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 26.2 to 20.9.
- Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 27.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 29.7 (#73)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), Llama 3.2 90B: 20.9 (#207)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.5 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 10.4 (#302)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#269)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 24.9 (#119)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), Llama 3.2 90B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 3.2 90B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 3.2 90B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.