Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs Llama 3.2 3B

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 Amazon

41.5

Rank #122 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 3B Meta

28.4

Rank #318 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads 56.9 to 24.9.
  • Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
ProviderAmazonMeta
Noometry Index41.528.4
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—118K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.33
Results tracked1718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.0 (#123), Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Coding14131098
BigCodeBench Instruct—23.4%
BigCodeBench Complete—28.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—21.9%
BALROG—10.1%

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 27.3 (#110), Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Hard Prompts13961095

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 36.2 (#121), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Math14251126

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 37.8 (#142), Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Expert13851090

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.7 (#127), Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Non-English13721019
LMArena Chinese14051017
LMArena German13911056
LMArena Russian1371949
LMArena French1426—
LMArena Japanese1355—
LMArena Korean1327—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.3 (#136), Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Instruction Following13651089

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#128), Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Longer Query13701101

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.9 (#131), Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20Llama 3.2 3B
LMArena Text13941110
LMArena Creative Writing13181094
LMArena Multi-Turn13641105
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—595

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 28.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 27.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and Llama 3.2 3B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper