Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs Llama 13b
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 683 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | — |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than Llama 13b?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and Llama 13b share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.