Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs DeepSeek LLM 67B
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeekSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 6 categories and DeepSeek LLM 67B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 54.7 to 31.6.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 41.9 | 24.9 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.2 (#145), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1096 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 27.3 (#120), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1070 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 110.5 |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1108 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 6.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 24.6% |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.3 (#150), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1073 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1341 | 1132 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.4 (#172), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1315 | 1079 |
Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.5 (#152), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1092 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 54.7 (#149), DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | DeepSeek LLM 67B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1364 | 1105 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1067 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1082 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than DeepSeek LLM 67B?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or DeepSeek LLM 67B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and DeepSeek LLM 67B share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15.