Model comparison
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads 55.0 to 47.7.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 41.4 | 38.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 39.6 (#142), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1371 | 1383 |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 26.2 (#122), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: —, GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 60.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1357 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 47.5 (#145), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1341 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1345 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | — | 1332 |
| LMArena German | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1351 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 69.7 (#167), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1316 | 1327 |
Long Context Too close to call
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 40.6 (#146), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1345 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 leads
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09: 55.0 (#144), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1365 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1307 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (39.6 vs 40.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 09 has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.