Model comparison

Aion 3.5 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Aion 3.5 AionLabs

58.1

Unranked Sparse

GLM-5.3-Flash Z.ai (Zhipu)

51.8

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Aion 3.5 leads 74.9 to 65.3.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $6 for Aion 3.5.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • GLM-5.3-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Aion 3.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash specifications
Aion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
ProviderAionLabsZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index58.151.8
Released—2026-08-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$3$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.50
Results tracked140

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#31)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
DeepSWE—63.4%
FrontierCode—31.8%
CursorBench—36.8%
LMArena WebDev—1609
FrontierSWE—18.1%
SciCode—51.6%
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—303.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.2 (#47)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
APEX-Agents—52.8%
GDP.pdf—14%

Reasoning Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0 (#42)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
ARC-AGI-2—65.8%
ARC-AGI-1—91%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—14%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1491
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Bench to the Future 3—0.15
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.88

Math Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.3 (#47)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—55.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.9%
ProofBench—21%
LMArena Math—1500

Knowledge Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#36)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
GPQA Diamond—90.2%
LMArena Expert—1513

Multimodal Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.8 (#27)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Vision—1296

Multilingual Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.0 (#25)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Non-English—1462
LMArena Chinese—1527
LMArena French—1496
LMArena German—1470
LMArena Japanese—1429
LMArena Korean—1446
LMArena Russian—1469
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.5 (#20)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following—1478

Long Context Not comparable

Aion 3.5: —, GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.4 (#39)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Aion 3.5 leads

Aion 3.5: 74.9, GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.3 (#50)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAion 3.5GLM-5.3-Flash
LMArena Text—1471
LMArena Creative Writing—1442
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1929—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1467

Frequently asked questions

Is Aion 3.5 better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-5.3-Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper