Model comparison
Aion 3.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Aion 3.5 leads 74.9 to 65.2.
- Both cost about the same: $3 input and $6 output per million tokens.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | AionLabs | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 57.9 | 51.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 1 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.74 |
Math Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1488 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1488 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1482 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1460 |
Long Context Not comparable
Aion 3.5: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1484 |
Writing & Preference Aion 3.5 leads
Aion 3.5: 74.9, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)
| Benchmark | Aion 3.5 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1450 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1929 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1482 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Aion 3.5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Aion 3.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, Aion 3.5 or Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens; Aion 3.5 lists at $3 and $6.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Aion 3.5 and Qwen3.7 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Aion 3.5 has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.