Noometry

Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

57.6

Unranked Sparse

Claude Sonnet 5 Anthropic

54.5

Rank #26 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 1 category and Claude Sonnet 5 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where AI Co-Mathematician leads 71.7 to 66.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 29.3% for Claude Sonnet 5.

Side by side

AI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
ProviderGoogleAnthropic
Noometry Index57.654.5
Released2026-05-082026-06-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked251

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 55.5 (#20)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
DeepSWE—53.8%
FrontierCode—42.7%
CursorBench—34.1%
LMArena WebDev—1540
SciCode—53.6%
GSO—37.3%
WeirdML—68.8%
LMArena Coding—1483
ALE-Bench—1,463

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 42.7 (#16)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
APEX-Agents—54.5%
GBAEval—65.3%
LMArena Search—1194
Vending-Bench 2—6,378

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 48.2 (#37)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
SimpleBench—60.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—75.1%
CritPt—16.9%
Chess Puzzles—35%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1461
Mystery Game Puzzles—35%
DTBench—92.5%
LMCA—50%
Surface Evolver Bench—60%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.34
ForecastBench—61.1

Math AI Co-Mathematician leads

AI Co-Mathematician: 71.7, Claude Sonnet 5: 66.1 (#21)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%29.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—65.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—94.7%
ProofBench—77%
LMArena Math—1467
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 55.7 (#42)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
GPQA Diamond—90.5%
SimpleQA Verified—33.7%
LMArena Expert—1491

Multimodal Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 42.4 (#26)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Vision—1275
Blueprint-Bench 2—24.9%
LMArena Document—1466

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 54.0 (#55)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Non-English—1431
LMArena Chinese—1475
LMArena French—1457
LMArena German—1448
LMArena Japanese—1422
LMArena Korean—1411
LMArena Russian—1452
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 76.6 (#39)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Instruction Following—1453

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 44.8 (#53)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Longer Query—1464

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Claude Sonnet 5: 69.4 (#24)

BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianClaude Sonnet 5
LMArena Text—1443
LMArena Creative Writing—1416
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1794
EQ-Bench 4—1236
LMArena Multi-Turn—1454

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than Claude Sonnet 5?

Claude Sonnet 5 has enough public results to be ranked (#26); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and Claude Sonnet 5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and Claude Sonnet 5 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper