Model comparison

AI Co-Mathematician vs Muse Spark 1.3

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

AI Co-Mathematician Google

58.1

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. AI Co-Mathematician scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.3 in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath Tier 4: 75.6% for AI Co-Mathematician and 46.3% for Muse Spark 1.3.

Side by side

AI Co-Mathematician and Muse Spark 1.3 specifications
AI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index58.154.8
Released2026-05-082026-09-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
CursorBench—41.6%
LMArena WebDev—1657
SciCode—59.7%
LMArena Coding—1514

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
APEX-Agents—57.8%
GDP.pdf—27.6%

Reasoning Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—26%
Chess Puzzles—38%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1503
Mystery Game Puzzles—25%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—53.9%
Bench to the Future 3—0.14
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.75

Math Too close to call

AI Co-Mathematician: 72.3, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
FrontierMath Tier 475.6%46.3%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1494
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)47.9%—

Knowledge Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Expert—1516

Multimodal Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Vision—1309
LMArena Document—1471

Multilingual Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Non-English—1481
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1524
LMArena German—1515
LMArena Japanese—1474
LMArena Korean—1501
LMArena Russian—1490
LMArena Spanish—1490

Instruction Following Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Longer Query—1488

Writing & Preference Not comparable

AI Co-Mathematician: —, Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAI Co-MathematicianMuse Spark 1.3
LMArena Text—1490
LMArena Creative Writing—1455
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1906
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is AI Co-Mathematician better than Muse Spark 1.3?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); AI Co-Mathematician does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do AI Co-Mathematician and Muse Spark 1.3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. AI Co-Mathematician has 2 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper