Meta, proprietary
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder by Meta ranks 43rd of 355 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 51.8. Its strongest category is multilingual, where it ranks 6th. API pricing starts at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #43 of 355
- Index score
- 51.8
- Evidence
- Confirmed 17 results
- Provider
Meta
- Released
- October 12, 2026
- Weights
- Proprietary
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Context window
- 1.05M
- Max output
- 131K
- Input price
- $4 / M
- Output price
- $20 / M
- Blended price
- $8 / M
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- #202 of 221
- Knowledge cutoff
- Unknown
- Input
- text, image, video, pdf, audio
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 56.3
- Agentic & Tool Use 35.3
- Reasoning 48.0
- Math 59.9
- Knowledge 42.7
- Multilingual 57.5
- Instruction Following 78.3
- Long Context 45.7
- Writing & Preference 68.6
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 56.3 | #22 | 3 |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 35.3 | #42 | 1 |
| Reasoning | 48.0 | #44 | 3 |
| Math | 59.9 | #39 | 1 |
| Knowledge | 42.7 | #98 | 1 |
| Multilingual | 57.5 | #6 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 78.3 | #11 | 1 |
| Long Context | 45.7 | #30 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 68.6 | #26 | 3 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where Muse Wonder places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multilingual | 57.5 | +10.3 | #6 of 298, top 3% |
| Instruction Following | 78.3 | +7.1 | #11 of 306, top 4% |
| Coding | 56.3 | +17.3 | #22 of 341, top 7% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge | 42.7 | +4.9 | #98 of 315, top 32% |
| Agentic & Tool Use | 35.3 | +4.5 | #42 of 156, top 27% |
| Reasoning | 48.0 | +24.0 | #44 of 351, top 13% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below Muse Wonder. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-6 Luna | #39 | 53.3 | $0.20 | — | Compare |
| GPT-5.2 Pro | #40 | 52.4 | $57.75 | — | Compare |
| Gemini 3 Flash Preview | #41 | 52.4 | $1.13 | — | Compare |
| GLM-5.3-Flash | #42 | 51.9 | $0.24 | — | Compare |
| Qwen3.6 Max Preview | #44 | 51.7 | $2.92 | — | Compare |
| Qwen3.7 Max | #45 | 51.6 | $3.75 | — | Compare |
| GLM-5.2 | #46 | 51.2 | $2.15 | 23 | Compare |
| GPT-5 | #47 | 50.9 | $3.44 | 2 | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1651 | #12 of 114, top 11% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 | |
| SciCode | 60.3% | #7 of 124, top 6% | max | Epoch AI | |
| LMArena Coding | 1529 | #7 of 295, top 3% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Agentic & Tool Use
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 30.8% | #4 of 39, top 11% | max | Epoch AI | |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 9,432 | #9 of 63, top 15% | Epoch AI |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 28.3% | #13 of 137, top 10% | max | Epoch AI | |
| EBR-Bench | 31.4% | #11 of 26, top 43% | max | Epoch AI | 2026-10-12 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1515 | #6 of 298, top 3% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 84% | #11 of 80, top 14% | Epoch AI |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | #22 of 274, top 9% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1490 | #6 of 298, top 3% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1521 | #3 of 284, top 2% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1497 | #8 of 299, top 3% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1492 | #12 of 292, top 5% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1504 | #5 of 298, top 2% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1485 | #10 of 296, top 4% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 | |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1531 | #2 of 296, top 1% | LMArena | 2026-10-13 |
API pricing by provider
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| meta | $4 | $20 | $0.20 | 2026-10-14 |
| openrouter | $4 | $20 | $0.20 | 2026-10-14 |
Compare Muse Wonder
- Muse Wonder vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview
- Muse Wonder vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
- Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.7 Max
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-5.2 Pro
- Muse Wonder vs GLM-5.2
- Muse Wonder vs GPT-6 Astra
- Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5
- Muse Wonder vs Gemini 4 Argon
- Muse Wonder vs Kimi K3
- Muse Wonder vs Grok 4.6
- Muse Wonder vs Qwen3.8 Max
- Muse Wonder vs GLM-5.3
- Muse Wonder vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Other Meta models
- Muse Spark 1.354.9
- Muse Spark50.7
- Muse Spark 1.250.5
- Muse Spark 1.150.1
- Muse Glimmer41.9
- Codellama 70b Instruct33.9
- Codellama 34b Instruct30.9
- Llama 4 Maverick30.9
Frequently asked questions
How good is Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder by Meta ranks 43rd of 355 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 51.8. Its strongest category is multilingual, where it ranks 6th. API pricing starts at $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, with a 1.05M-token context window.
How much does Muse Wonder cost?
Muse Wonder costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens on Meta's own API, with cached input at $0.20.
What is Muse Wonder's context window?
Muse Wonder accepts up to 1.05M tokens of input and can write up to 131K tokens in one response.
Is Muse Wonder open source?
No. Muse Wonder is proprietary and available only through Meta's API and partner platforms.
What are Muse Wonder's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, Muse Wonder places best in multilingual, instruction following, coding and lowest in knowledge, agentic & tool use, reasoning.
What is Muse Wonder best at?
Its best category is multilingual, where it ranks 6th on Noometry.