Google, open weights

# Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT by Google. Ranked #313 of 354 with a Noometry Index of 29.3. Scores, sources and comparisons.
- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/models/gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Title: Gemma 1.1 2b IT Benchmarks, Price & Rank (October 2026)

Gemma 1.1 2b IT by Google ranks 313th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 29.3. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 232nd.

Last verified October 10, 2026

## Specifications

- **Noometry rank:** #313 of 354
- **Index score:** 29.3
- **Evidence:** Confirmed 16 results
- **Provider:** [![](/logos/google.svg) Google](https://noometry.com/providers/google)
- **Released:** Unknown
- **Weights:** Open weights
- **Reasoning:** Unknown
- **Context window:** —
- **Max output:** —
- **Input price:** Not listed
- **Output price:** Not listed
- **Blended price:** Not listed
- **Output speed:** Not measured
- **Value:** Not ranked
- **Knowledge cutoff:** Unknown

## Category scores

Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.

Gemma 1.1 2b IT category scores

1.  Coding 30.1
2.  Reasoning 19.1
3.  Math 30.8
4.  Knowledge 26.5
5.  Multilingual 24.6
6.  Instruction Following 49.9
7.  Long Context 30.6
8.  Writing & Preference 25.1
9.  0204060

Gemma 1.1 2b IT category ranks
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Coding](https://noometry.com/best/coding) | 30.1 | #299 | 1 |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 19.1 | #270 | 1 |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 30.8 | #232 | 1 |
| [Knowledge](https://noometry.com/best/knowledge) | 26.5 | #258 | 1 |
| [Multilingual](https://noometry.com/best/multilingual) | 24.6 | #289 | 1 |
| [Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/best/instruction-following) | 49.9 | #299 | 1 |
| [Long Context](https://noometry.com/best/long-context) | 30.6 | #286 | 1 |
| [Writing & Preference](https://noometry.com/best/writing) | 25.1 | #306 | 3 |

## Strengths and weaknesses

Categories where Gemma 1.1 2b IT places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.

### Strongest categories

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Math](https://noometry.com/best/math) | 30.8 | −5.8 | #232 of 327, top 71% |
| [Reasoning](https://noometry.com/best/reasoning) | 19.1 | −4.5 | #270 of 350, top 78% |
| [Knowledge](https://noometry.com/best/knowledge) | 26.5 | −10.8 | #258 of 314, top 83% |

### Weakest categories

Gemma 1.1 2b IT: weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Writing & Preference](https://noometry.com/best/writing) | 25.1 | −28.7 | #306 of 312, top 99% |
| [Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/best/instruction-following) | 49.9 | −21.4 | #299 of 305, top 99% |
| [Multilingual](https://noometry.com/best/multilingual) | 24.6 | −22.8 | #289 of 297, top 98% |

## Closest competitors

The models ranked just above and below Gemma 1.1 2b IT. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.

Models ranked closest to Gemma 1.1 2b IT
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Llama 2-13B](https://noometry.com/models/llama-2-13b) | #309 | 29.6 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-llama-2-13b) |
| [Claude 3 Opus](https://noometry.com/models/claude-3-opus) | #310 | 29.5 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it) |
| [DBRX](https://noometry.com/models/dbrx) | #311 | 29.4 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it) |
| [Gemma 2 27B](https://noometry.com/models/gemma-2-27b) | #312 | 29.4 | $0.65 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gemma-2-27b) |
| [Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct](https://noometry.com/models/phi-3-small-8k-instruct) | #314 | 29.3 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct) |
| [Claude 3.5 Haiku](https://noometry.com/models/claude-3-5-haiku) | #315 | 29.2 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it) |
| [GPT-4](https://noometry.com/models/gpt-4) | #316 | 29.1 | $37.50 | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gpt-4) |
| [Llama 2-7B](https://noometry.com/models/llama-2-7b) | #317 | 29.1 | — | — | [Compare](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-llama-2-7b) |

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. [Advertise on Noometry](https://noometry.com/advertise)

## Benchmark results

Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.

### Coding

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Coding benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Coding](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-coding) | 1034 | #286 of 294, top 98% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [HumanEval+](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/humaneval-plus) | 17.7% | #45 of 45, top 100% |  | [EvalPlus](https://evalplus.github.io/leaderboard.html) |  |
| [MBPP+](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/mbpp-plus) | 23.3% | #38 of 38, top 100% |  | [EvalPlus](https://evalplus.github.io/leaderboard.html) |  |

### Reasoning

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Reasoning benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Hard Prompts](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-hard-prompts) | 1005 | #291 of 297, top 98% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Math

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Math benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Math](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-math) | 1047 | #278 of 285, top 98% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Knowledge

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Knowledge benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Expert](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-expert) | 970 | #273 of 273, top 100% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Multilingual

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Multilingual benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Non-English](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-non-english) | 988 | #289 of 297, top 98% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena Chinese](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-chinese) | 1012 | #276 of 285, top 97% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena German](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-german) | 944 | #230 of 231, top 100% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena Korean](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-korean) | 899 | #210 of 213, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena Russian](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-russian) | 990 | #278 of 283, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Instruction Following

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Instruction Following benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Instruction Following](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-instruction-following) | 992 | #293 of 298, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Long Context

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Long Context benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Longer Query](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-longer-query) | 1003 | #286 of 291, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

### Writing & Preference

Gemma 1.1 2b IT Writing & Preference benchmark results
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [LMArena Text](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-text) | 1022 | #293 of 297, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena Creative Writing](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-creative-writing) | 998 | #289 of 295, top 98% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |
| [LMArena Multi-Turn](https://noometry.com/benchmarks/arena-multi-turn) | 959 | #292 of 295, top 99% |  | [LMArena](https://lmarena.ai/leaderboard/text) | 2026-10-08 |

## Compare Gemma 1.1 2b IT

-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Gemma 2 27B](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gemma-2-27b)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-phi-3-small-8k-instruct)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs DBRX](https://noometry.com/compare/dbrx-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Claude 3.5 Haiku](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-5-haiku-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Claude 3 Opus](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-3-opus-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-4](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gpt-4)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GPT-6 Astra](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-gpt-6-astra)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Claude Fable 5.1](https://noometry.com/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Kimi K3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-kimi-k3)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Grok 4.6](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-grok-4-6)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Qwen3.8 Max](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-qwen3-8-max)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs GLM-5.3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-glm-5-3)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Muse Spark 1.3](https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-1-1-2b-it-vs-muse-spark-1-3)
-   [Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs DeepSeek V4 Pro](https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v4-pro-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it)

## Other Google models

-   [Gemini 3.8 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-8-flash)61.8
-   [Gemini 3.7 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-7-flash)59.8
-   [Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-1-pro-preview)56.7
-   [Gemini 4 Argon](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-4-argon)56.5
-   [Gemini 3 Pro](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-pro)54.8
-   [Gemini 3.5 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-5-flash)54.2
-   [Gemini 3.6 Flash](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-6-flash)54.1
-   [Gemini 3 Flash Preview](https://noometry.com/models/gemini-3-flash-preview)52.3

## Frequently asked questions

### How good is Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT by Google ranks 313th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 29.3. Its strongest category is math, where it ranks 232nd.

### Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT open source?

Yes. Gemma 1.1 2b IT's weights are downloadable; check the license for commercial terms.

### What are Gemma 1.1 2b IT's strengths and weaknesses?

Relative to other ranked models, Gemma 1.1 2b IT places best in math, reasoning, knowledge and lowest in writing & preference, instruction following, multilingual.

### What is Gemma 1.1 2b IT best at?

Its best category is math, where it ranks 232nd on Noometry.

### Cite this page

Noometry. (2026). Gemma 1.1 2b IT benchmarks and pricing. Retrieved October 10, 2026, from https://noometry.com/models/gemma-1-1-2b-it

Quote Noometry with a link back to this page. It is also available in [Markdown](https://noometry.com/md/models/gemma-1-1-2b-it.md).