# Trinity Large Thinking vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/trinity-large-thinking-vs-tulu-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Trinity Large Thinking scores higher in 6 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 37.6 to 14.2.

## Snapshot

| | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Arcee AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 185 | 251 |
| Context | 262K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.25 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.80 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1381 | 1235 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1238 | — |
| SciCode | 36.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1350 | 1220 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 16.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.9% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.6% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 15.6% | — |

## Math

- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1366 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |

## Knowledge

- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1360 | — |

## Multilingual

- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1325 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1337 | 1246 |
| LMArena French | 1374 | — |
| LMArena German | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1357 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1334 | 1233 |

## Long Context

- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1355 | 1224 |

## Writing & Preference

- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
- Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

| Benchmark | Trinity Large Thinking | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1320 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Trinity Large Thinking better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Trinity Large Thinking or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Trinity Large Thinking and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Trinity Large Thinking has 24 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.