# Step 2 16k Exp 202412 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/step-2-16k-exp-202412-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 171 | 185 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1316 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1299 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1304 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1290 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1337 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1287 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1307 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Step 2 16k Exp 202412 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1321 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1328 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1292 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.2 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Step 2 16k Exp 202412 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Step 2 16k Exp 202412 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.