# Sonar vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Sonar and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.5 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/sonar-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Sonar leads 21.1 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Perplexity | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.5 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 187 | 185 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $1 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Sonar: 35.7 (#221)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | 35.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Reasoning

- Sonar: 21.1 (#227)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.9% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench | 46.9% | — |

## Math

- Sonar: 33.7 (#200)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 41.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Sonar: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |

## Multilingual

- Sonar: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Sonar: 71.4 (#150)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 76.2% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Sonar: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Sonar: 52.6 (#167)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Sonar | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |
| LiveBench Language | 44.1% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Sonar better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Sonar and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.5 vs 38.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, Sonar or Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

### Is Sonar or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Sonar and Trinity Large Thinking share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Sonar has 7 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.