# QwQ-32B vs Wizardlm 70b

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwq-32b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where QwQ-32B leads 72.6 to 56.3.

## Snapshot

| | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.8 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 159 | 249 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1081 |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1325 | 1079 |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |

## Math

- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1324 | — |

## Multilingual

- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1305 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |

## Instruction Following

- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1093 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |

## Long Context

- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1097 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1108 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is QwQ-32B better than Wizardlm 70b?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is QwQ-32B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.