# QwQ-32B vs Step 3

> QwQ-32B and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwq-32b-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. QwQ-32B scores higher in 4 categories and Step 3 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where QwQ-32B leads 49.0 to 40.3.

## Snapshot

| | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 153 | 145 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |

## Math

- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1323 | 1333 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- QwQ-32B: —
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |

## Multilingual

- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1306 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1313 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 1278 | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1263 | — |

## Instruction Following

- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1332 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |

## Long Context

- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is QwQ-32B better than Step 3?

QwQ-32B and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.4 vs 39.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is QwQ-32B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.