# QwQ-32B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwq-32b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 40.9 to 36.2.

## Snapshot

| | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 153 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 39.4 (#147)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 20.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 44.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 72.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1333 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 20.9 (#211)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 5% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 137.6 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.3 | — |
| LiveBench | 72% | — |

## Math

- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.9 (#74)

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 59.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |

## Knowledge

- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 65.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1323 | — |

## Multilingual

- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1378 | — |
| LMArena French | 1337 | — |
| LMArena German | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1297 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | — |

## Instruction Following

- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | — |

## Long Context

- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | QwQ-32B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 80.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is QwQ-32B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 36.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is QwQ-32B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do QwQ-32B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. QwQ-32B has 36 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.