# Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Coder Next in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 25.5 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 41.2% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 190 | 232 |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $1.50 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 41.2% | 34.4% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1275 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 461.45 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.44 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 27.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1365 | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena French | 1398 | — |
| LMArena German | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1360 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1355 | — |

## Long Context

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1378 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1365 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

### Is Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.5 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.