# Qwen3.7 Plus vs Wizardlm 13b

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-plus-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 64.5 to 30.7.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 45.0 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 66 | 272 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.60 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1473 | 1035 |
| FrontierCode | 10.2% | — |
| SciCode | 45.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | 2.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1460 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.8% | — |
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 84% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.39 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1467 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 34.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1467 | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1445 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1510 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1471 | — |
| LMArena German | 1471 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1453 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1439 | 1049 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1454 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1454 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1439 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1459 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Wizardlm 13b?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.