# Qwen3.7 Plus vs Solar Pro4

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-plus-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher in 7 categories and Solar Pro4 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 39.8.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 524K.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 45.3 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 72 | 121 |
| Context | 1M | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $1.60 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1473 | 1437 |
| FrontierCode | 10.2% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
| SciCode | 45.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | 2.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1460 | 1399 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 74.8% | — |
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 24% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 17% | — |
| DTBench | 84% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.37 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1466 | 1416 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 34.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 93.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1467 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1279 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1445 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1510 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1473 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1471 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1413 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1415 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1440 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Plus | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1439 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1460 | 1385 |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Plus better than Solar Pro4?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Qwen3.7 Plus or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 524K.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Plus and Solar Pro4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Plus has 32 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.