# Qwen3.7 Max vs Wizardlm 70b

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/qwen3-7-max-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 32.2.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 42 | 249 |
| Context | 1M | — |
| Input $/M | $2.50 | — |
| Output $/M | $7.50 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1081 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1079 |
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |

## Math

- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1490 | 1116 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |

## Knowledge

- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | — |

## Multilingual

- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |

## Instruction Following

- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Wizardlm 70b?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Qwen3.7 Max or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Wizardlm 70b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.